From bbryson at uen.org Wed May 1 11:12:20 2013 From: bbryson at uen.org (Barry Bryson) Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 17:12:20 +0000 Subject: [tforum] OpenWest Message-ID: I realize this is very short notice, but for those of you not aware the OpenWest conference will be hosted by UVU May 2-4 (starting tomorrow). The cost is only $80 and looks to be a great conference. http://www.openwest.org/ bb From bbryson at uen.org Mon May 13 13:36:45 2013 From: bbryson at uen.org (Barry Bryson) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 19:36:45 +0000 Subject: [tforum] UEN Technical Summit 2013 Room Block Message-ID: Just a reminder that the room block for the 2013 UEN Technical Summit closes this Friday May 17th. If you haven't booked a room yet please do so soon. There are still plenty left. Please register as soon as you can if you will be attending. We have started ordering materials. More information at: http://summit.uen.org Note that there have been some changes and additions to the schedule. Check them out if you have not visited the site in a while. Thanks bb From joe.breen at utah.edu Fri May 24 12:13:49 2013 From: joe.breen at utah.edu (Joe Breen) Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:13:49 -0600 Subject: [tforum] Fwd: [sciencedmz] impact of a small amount of packet loss on throughput In-Reply-To: References: <664F61D8-F239-45B1-9057-3955C0297988@es.net> Message-ID: For those troubleshooting performance or wondering how dirty networks impact traffic, the below message link and associated info might be of interest. To give a feel in terms of scale, 13-15ms round trip time latency allows you across the state of UT (north/south) on UEN's backbone. 25-30ms of round trip latency allows you to Kansas or Houston. 50-60ms of latency allows you to travel to/from Atlanta or New York from the UofU. 159ms of round trip latency allows your packets to visit London and back. 160-170ms of round trip latency will allow your packets to visit Beijing, China. 229ms of round trip latency will allow your packets to travel to Bangalore, India and back. --Joe ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Brian Tierney Date: Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:37 AM Subject: [sciencedmz] impact of a small amount of packet loss on throughput To: Science DMZ List Folks on this list might find this interesting: > http://fasterdata.es.net/performance-testing/perfsonar/troubleshooting/packet-loss/ No surprises here, but the plot shows pretty dramatically how if you are trying to move data more than 10ms away using TCP, you need a clean path! _______________________________________________ This is the sciencedmz mailing list. To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list, go to https://listserv.es.net/mailman/listinfo/sciencedmz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://lists.uen.org/pipermail/tforum/attachments/20130524/31bb481f/attachment-0001.html